Yonkers Parking Authority Debt Service Report BY YONKERS INSPECTOR GENERAL DAN SCHORR

eHezi Archives 11 Comments


Schorr_DanText was missing from report; now updated. 

Read the Yonkers Tribune, June 28, 2010 editorial entitled: The Hezitorial: Yonkers City Hall Deceives City Agencies to Cover Up Mayor’s $800,000 Blunder BY HEZI ARIS for background information.

Inspector General Dan Schorr's Yonkers Parking Authority Debt Service Report

Yonkers, NY, July 1, 2010 — This report is issued in response to Mayor Philip A. Amicone's letter dated May 6, 2010, which directed the Inspector General to "research and then recommend an appropriate course ofaction regarding the Yonkers Parking Authority's (YPA) request to amend its 1964 Master Service Agreement so that the debt service for refinancing will be guaranteed in the unlikely event of a default on the part ofthe YPA."


In order to restructure existing debt of approximately $2.3 million and pay for the anticipated judgment regarding the prior acquisition of property located at 310 Saw Mill River Road, the YPA has proposed issuing a new bond for approximately $3.5 million. The City would guarantee the bond and each year must appropriate $350,000 in the budget in the event the YPA could not make the monthly payments. A more prudent short-term option would be for the YPA to deed the property to the City and for the City to advance the YPA $800,000 from a Capital Improvement Plan bond issue. The YPA would then re-pay the City annually through direct payments or a reduction in the annual City payment related to the Buena Vista parking garage. Furthermore, the City should study the potential advantages and disadvantages associated with consolidating the YPA into the City.

Background

The YPA was established in 1964 and is governed by a Master Service Agreement with the City which was adopted that year and subsequently amended. The YPA currently has just under $2.3 million in bonded debt, for which it must make annual payments of approximately $240,000 until 2024. Additionally, the current bond requires a 1.25 coverage ratio, meaning that the YP A must show a net surplus of 1.25 times the annual payment, or approximately $300,000, in order to demonstrate the financial stability the bond agreement mandates.

In 2001, the YPA took possession by eminent domain of property located at 310 Saw Mill River Road and is currently in litigation with the prior owner regarding valuation of the property and appropriate payment. The YPA anticipates an imminent final settlement that will require it to compensate the owner with approximately $800,000, all of which will have to be paid this year. Due to the fact that the YPA does not have available funds to cover this judgment, nor the ability the independently borrow them, it is seeking assistance from the City. The YPA has proposed that the City guarantee a new $3.5 million YPA bond which would cover the debt on the original bond and the above-mentioned costs associated with the 310 Saw Mill River Road property.

Mayor Amicone directed the Inspector General to research this proposal and recommend an appropriate course of action. The objectives of our review were to:

1. Research the new YP A bond proposal and assess the benefits and drawbacks for the City.

2. Analyze whether alternatives would be more cost-effective and limit the financial exposure of the City while still keeping the yPA solvent.

3. Recommend an appropriate course of action for the City and the YPA.

We reviewed all relevant documents, including the 1964 Master Agreement, amendments to the Agreement, the 2010 YP A operating budget, a proposed Supplemental Parking Permit of Use and Operating Agreement, and a proposed City Council resolution. Additionally, our office conducted a site visit to the relevant parking facility and interviewed YPA Chairman William Regan, YPA CFO Joseph Dalli, City Finance Commissioner James LaPerche, bond underwriters Herman Charbonneau and Chuck Stavitski, bond counsel Aurora Cassirer, members of the City Council, and other individuals.

Discussion

YPA Proposal for City to Guarantee Approximately $3.5 Million in Debt

The YPA initially proposes that it convey the property at 310 Saw Mill River Road to the City and that the City grant the YPA a permit of use for the parking facility. The YPA would then issue a new bond, guaranteed by the City, for approximately $3.5 million to re-finance its current bond debt and pay the expected judgment regarding the property. The YPA would have to pay approximately $325,000 per year thru 2024, with the City using its already-limited funds to make up for any YPA shortfall.

The advantages of such a proposal are that the YPA would no longer have to abide by a 1.25 coverage ratio on their new debt and it would have the funds to pay for the expected legal judgment involving 310 Saw Mill River Road.

However, there are significant detriments to the proposal. First, the City would be responsible for $3.5 million in new debt if the YPA is unable to remain solvent. Incurring new debt on the part of the City should be avoided if possible, and other options should be evaluated in order to not subject the City to such financial exposure, especially while the YPA's finances are not directly monitored and controlled by the City.

Furthermore, Herman Charbonneau, the bond underwriter retained by the YPA, is requiring the City to add a $350,000 line item in each year's budget, starting with fiscal year 2012, so that money is appropriated in the event the YP A cannot make its payments. Any unused money from this line item would be rolled over into the next year's budget. Clearly, in this financial climate it is especially difficult for the City to add $350,000 to the budget. We have been informed by YPA officials that this requirement could not be avoided by utilizing a different underwriter.

Additionally, the YPA will be making mont
hly payments towards the annual $325,000 requirement, and although it anticipates being able to cover this amount each year, it may not always have sufficient funds for each month's payment because of seasonal swings in revenues. Thus, the YPA may need the City's assistance for anticipated cash flow issues.

Thus, in some months the City could be sending funds to the YPA, and in other months the YP A will be paying back the City. In this scenario, funds could very often be moving back and forth between the YPA and the City, raising significant issues with transparency, stability, and accountability .

Finally, with the guarantee that the City must cover any shortage in a given month, there is less urgency for the YPA to come up with solutions to address any future financial issues. Any shortfall of the YPA will be made up by the City through the $350,000 it must allocate in its yearly budget for possible YPA debt service. The City's guarantee of the new bond is too easy to rely upon in this arrangement.

More Limited Proposal for Assistance to YPA

Failing to provide assistance to the YPA with its expected judgment regarding the 310 Saw Mill River Road property will most likely lead to the YPA being unable to pay the judgment and cause serious financial consequences. Although the YPA is independent, financial failure on its part could very well result in damage to the City's operation and reputation regarding financial responsibility. We suggest a revised plan of City assistance that will aid the YPA in the short-term while limiting the City's financial exposure.

As with the YP A proposal, we recommend that the YPA deed the property to the City and that the City grant the YPA a permit of use. However, instead of the YPA issuing a new bond for approximately $3.5 million, another solution is for the City to bond enough money through their

Capital Improvement Plan to advance the YP A approximately $800,000 to cover the expected judgment.

In order to pay for this new bond, the YP A will have to compensate the City with approximately $85,000 per year until 2024. One option is to reduce the City's annual payment to the YPA related to the Buena Vista parking garage by $85,000. In addition, the City can explore the option of selling the 310 Saw Mill River Road facility, which is not currently generating significant revenue. Proceeds from a sale would be used to pay down this new debt.

With this option, the City will not be responsible for $3.5 million in YPA debt, and will not have to add a budget line in an already stretched budget. The YPA will have to pay approximately $325,000 each year for debt service ($240,000 for their existing bond and $85,000 for the City), basically the same amount as in the original proposal. If the $800,000 is bonded over a longer period of time, the annual debt service payment of$85,000 would be reduced.

This plan provides greater financial incentives for the YPA, as it will not automatically receive additional funds from the City if it incurs a budget deficit. It will not be able to simply dip into the City'S money each month to pay the debt service.

Long-Term Prospects for the YPA

We recommend that the City explore folding the YPA into the City government. Consolidating the YP A into the City might allow for greater oversight and certain cost-savings, such as with salaried positions that duplicate functions already existing in the City. Potential drawbacks of consolidation, including combining workforces from different bargaining units and the possible politicization of parking decision-making, must also be investigated and considered.

Consolidation should be analyzed and enacted if it appears to be beneficial for the City.

Conclusions and Recommendations

Our analysis of the YPA request to amend its 1964 Master Service Agreement so that its debt service for refinancing will be guaranteed by the City in the event of a default on the part ofthe YP A leads us to conclude that a more modest plan of City assistance is warranted in order to limit the City's financial exposure, while still preventing the financial collapse of the YPA.

We make the following specific recommendations:

• The City take ownership of the property located at 310 Saw Mill River Road and advance the YPA funds to payoff the anticipated judgment by bonding approximately $800,000 in the Capital Improvement Plan

• The YPA repay the City with either annual payments or a reduction in the annual City payment to the YPA related to the Buena Vista parking garage

• The City analyze the potential cost-savings and investigate other advantages and disadvantages of consolidating the YPA into the City and proceed with consolidation if it appears beneficial.

Enhanced by Zemanta

eHeziYonkers Parking Authority Debt Service Report BY YONKERS INSPECTOR GENERAL DAN SCHORR

Comments 11

  1. As chair Mayor Amicone would have as many votes as another board member! Mr. Spano was a board member at the time that we speak of, thus by blaming the Mayor for mismanagement you are by right blaming also the rest of the Board including Mr. Spano! As board member it was Mr. Spano’s duty to question anything and everything: yet again a SpaNO failed to do his duty! Vote them out!

  2. eyes wide shut check you facts-Phil Amicone was Chair of the Board at the time you are talking about-thats why Joe Dalli is there Amicone trying to cover his mismanagement

  3. yonkersvoter, you should check the mismanagement that occurred under the watchful eye of a Mr. Spano! It was actually under these new management that the YPA is seeing a turn around. New may not always be bad, but we already know what the old has produced and it stinks! Vote them all out!

  4. Maybe if the Mayor had put someone with some experience in charge of the Yonkers Parking Authority instead of Joe Dalli(former aid to the Mayor with absolutely NO experience other than the Mayors lapdog) they wouldnt have the problems they do. Lots of money has been lost this is an agency that shoudl be investigated-you would be amazed at the corruption and mismanagment. And we wonder why Yonkers is in such fiscal trouble. Never send a little boy to do a mans job.

  5. “…in the unlikely event of a default on the part of the YPA.” why are we wasting time studying this if it is unlikely to happen?

  6. I SAY LET’S GET RID OF DAN SCHORR AND HIS CAMPAIGN MANAGER WHO IS ALSO ON THE CITY’S DOLE…………..POLITICAL HACKS, BOTH OF THE………….GET RID OF THEM AND KEEP OUR FIREFIGHTERS!

  7. Hi! Ho! Hi! Ho! it’s off to borrow we go.
    It ain’t no trick
    To get rich quick
    If you dig dig dig
    With a pen or a a slick lawyer dick
    In a Yonkers
    In a Yonkers
    Where the taxpayers Shine
    They dig dig dig dig dig dig dig from early morn to night
    They dig dig dig dig dig dig dig up everything in sight
    They dig up bonds and increase taxes
    By the score
    A million dollars
    Sometimes more
    They know you they dig them for
    They rob rob rob rob, for the friends and family.
    Hi! Ho! Hi! Ho! it’s the really shitty city we all know.
    Hi! Ho! Hi! Ho! it’s off to rob we go,with a taxpayers here, and taxpayers there.

  8. the city should sell all property it holds at market value and at open auction. this includes ida and cda.
    if you tell me these aren’t government agencies – then cut them loose and let them sink or swim.

  9. A previous posting of this article had a computer issue. This is a repost of a comment appended to the now discarded posting:
    VivaLaVidaLopez said…
    I bet his campaign manager now working on the 2nd floor helped him with this…
    July 02, 2010 at 06:42 AM
    Re POSTED by editor. Kindly, Hezi

Leave a Reply

This comment will be displayed anonymously. Your name and email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.