Reflections on Hosni Mubarak’s Resignation By Daniel Pipes

eHezi Archives 1 Comment

First published by Lion's Den :: Daniel Pipes Blog   on February 11, 2011 with an update on February 12, 2011. It is reprinted with express permission:

Pipes_Daniel-photo Long gone are Egypt's revolutionary days of the 1950-60s, when Gamal Abdel Nasser dominated Middle Eastern politics by stirring the Arabic-speaking masses, forming unions with other countries, starting wars, exporting ideologies and songs, and deftly maneuvering between superpowers. So too have the hopes of the 1970s vanished – Anwar El-Sadat's economic opening, American alliance, and a peace treaty with Israel.

Egypt's turbulence of the prior thirty years wound down when Hosni Mubarak ascended to office in 1981. His rule began on a positive and calming note. I dubbed him "Mayor of Egypt" in tribute to his focus on traffic flyovers and other infrastructure, rather than on grand gestures of war and peace.

But the mayor morphed over time into a would-be pharaoh. His ego expanded and his repression increased. Stagnation settled in. Dynastic ambitions took hold. If Mubarak's rule never reached the depths of misery to be found in nearby countries such as Syria and Iraq, it was awful enough, with a nearly ubiquitous surveillance and too much police brutality.

Americans recoiled from this tyranny but what Franklin D. Roosevelt memorably was quoted saying about a Latin America dictator, "He's a bastard but he's our bastard," also applied to Mubarak. When American policymakers looked over the abyss and into Egyptian public opinion, the hostility they saw among Nasserists and Islamists made Mubarak look good.

And so, as the decades wore on, Washington stood by Mubarak, supplying him with hefty sums of aid, opening the military cupboard for him to build a superfluous conventional force (there is a peace treaty with Israel; neither Sudan nor Libya remotely pose a threat). In return, he adhered to a set of policies not too obnoxious to Americans.

All observers agreed that Mubarak's demise would release pressure-cooker style forces; the street disturbances that culminated in his resignation today came as an early surprise. But the effect is roughly the same, to send the country into unchartered waters after decades of idleness. As someone who enjoyed Egyptian hospitality for three years, I wish the country well but worry deeply for it and the damage it can do. 



Enhanced by Zemanta

eHeziReflections on Hosni Mubarak’s Resignation By Daniel Pipes

Comments 1

  1. The population in Egypt has roughly doubled from 40 million to 80 million people in 30 years in a desert country, where almost the whole population exists on 10% of the land.Egypt also imports 80% of its wheat, that has skyrocketed in price since the federal reserve has unofficially devalued the dollar.Egypt has a vibrant economy, but that economy cannot feed with food or jobs an explosive birth rate.Islam is not the answer, it is the problem and the protestors have not addressed the underlying problem of a population out of control.

Leave a Reply

This comment will be displayed anonymously. Your name and email address will not be published.

Comments that are off topic will be removed. If you want a topic to be covered, email me at:

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.