Ed Koch Commentary: President Obama’s Hostility to Israel Continues By Ed Koch

eHezi Archives 5 Comments

KOCH_Ed The issues in all of the discussions on peace between the Israelis and Palestinians have revolved around three major controversial matters: Jerusalem, with the Palestinians demanding their capital be in that city; and demanding a return of all Palestinian refugees and their descendants now numbering 4.5 million to the state of Israel; and the lines of the new state.

The two pre-Netanyahu prime ministers offered to share the capital of Jerusalem, giving to the Palestinian state that part of East Jerusalem in which Muslims now live, retaining for Israel that part of East Jerusalem in which 250,000 Jews now live and retaining about 3 percent of the West Bank in which about 300,000 Jews live. And most critical, requiring all Palestinian refugees seeking to return to be resettled in the new state of Palestine. The Palestinian leaders, Yasser Arafat and Mahmoud Abbas, turned down the offers on every occasion. Also, neither Arab leader has been willing to state that they would recognize Israel as a Jewish state – they having a Muslim state – if and when an agreement creating two states was entered into.
And that is the nub of the disagreement in my opinion. In my opinion, Palestinians and their Arab allies have no intention of ever accepting a Jewish state in their midst. Many in the Muslim world believe that every square inch of Israel belongs to Islam and will someday be theirs; they have no intention of accepting the existence of a Jewish state. At best, they will accept a temporary truce with an entity called Israel which they will whittle away at, later overwhelm and absorb in the future.
There are those who will say how does President Obama’s reference to boundaries in his statement of May 19, 2011 differ from that proposed by President Bush. Both referred to the 1967 lines. President Bush added language referring to the facts on the ground, a reference to the 250,000 Jews living in East Jerusalem and 300,000 living on the West Bank. As The Times of January 11, 2008 reported, “By endorsing compensation for refugees, Mr. Bush sided, at least indirectly, with an Israeli view that the return of Palestinians to Israel was unacceptable since it would change the identity of Israel as a Jewish state. Similarly, he endorsed the notion of Israel as ‘a homeland for the Jewish people,’ and ‘Palestine as a homeland for the Palestinian people.’”
But even more important than the phrasing is the lack of trust. Jews and Christian supporters of Israel in the U.S. and the Israeli people and their leaders trusted President Bush with respect to the U.S. commitment to Israel’s security and believed they could rely on the U.S. should Israel be once again attacked by the Arab nations. They do not have confidence in President Obama’s commitment to Israel’s security.
What should President Obama have said to deal with these fears? He should have first said that Israel will only be called on to negotiate with the Palestinian Authority when Hamas now an equal partner with Fatah in the Palestinian governing authority agrees to three conditions required by the Quartet. The Quartet, made up of the U.S., European Union, U.N. and Russia, has stated that for Hamas to gain international legitimacy, it must: one, recognize the right of Israel to exist; two, renounce the use of terrorism and violence; and three, accept all prior agreements and obligations, including the roadmap. Further, President Obama should have required of the Palestinian Authority a public commitment stated in English, Arabic and Hebrew that upon conclusion of peace negotiations and the signing of a peace agreement, the Palestinian Authority will state it recognizes Israel as a Jewish state, which it has continually refused to do.
If President Obama does not change his position, I cannot vote for his reelection. I’ve already made clear I won’t vote for some crazy who urges we jettison Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid as federal programs. I can stay home.
President Obama’s efforts to reassure supporters of Israel, at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) on May 22 did not reassure me. Those assurances reported by the Times “that the United States commitment to Israel’s long term security was ironclad,” rings hollow, knowing iron breaks and was broken back in March 2010.
Adding to the lack of credibility of the process urged by President Obama on this issue of secure borders is what Saeb Erekat, the chief Palestinian negotiator said, reported in the Times, “I am waiting to hear from Prime Minister Netanyahu. Does he accept the doctrine of two states on the 1967 lines with agreed swaps or not?” I believe the Palestinian Authority with Hamas in the lead will not swap so as to accommodate the continuation on the West Bank of 300,000 Jews.
President Obama’s remarks have lifted up the spirits of Palestinians, who now believe he has given them the upper hand. Supporters of Israel, Jews and Christians, Democrats and Republicans, now is the time to make your positions known. Members of Congress, you are not potted plants. Let the President know you disagree with him. We must stand strong for Israel in this time of great danger.
The Honorable Edward Irving Koch served New York City as its 105th Mayor from 1978 to 1989.

eHeziEd Koch Commentary: President Obama’s Hostility to Israel Continues By Ed Koch

Comments 5

  1. I hope the bridge that was named after Ed koch doesn’t change traffic directions as many times as Koch has with his political support for or against Obama. Whatever concessions Israel makes the Arab Muslim world will not be happy till all Jews,Christians and other religions are annihilated.The only good Democrat is a defeated Democrat.

  2. no I want Israel to recognize that they were a creation
    of the UN…there was no Israel before 1947..and that
    in creating the state of israel arabs were removed
    from that territory…the borders they won in a war
    does not give them the right to expand forever into
    the west bank and gaza..it gives them leverage in
    order to come to some agreement about a two state solution which will require them to give some land to
    palestine in return for incorporating those settlements
    into a greater Israel..everyone recognizes those are
    the facts on the ground except those who simply want
    to keep criticizing Obama over everything he does
    stop listening to rush and hannity and start thinking
    for yourself…all the arab nations have already offered a comprehensive peace deal…its time to stop
    the right wing nut job parties from holding peace hostage to their zealous belief in the bible..

  3. You want Israel to be the only country in the history of the world to give back land that they won in a war that they did not start???….Stop attacking them and you won’t loose more!!!

  4. The president is not hostile to Israel..the President
    is a realist..Israel is occupying lands that were not
    given to it by the original 1947 UN resolution…true
    they fought a war in 1967 but that does not excuse the
    fact that they have been driven by orthodox zealots
    to “reclaim” what they describe as their biblicalhome
    all of the west bank eg judea and samaria the problem
    is that when the UN created the state there were people
    living in “palestine” who had to move out..now you can
    argue that he hebrew’s were there first 5000 years ago
    but you can’t argue with the poliitcal fact that
    in 1947 those who were there were not jews ..they
    were arabs and they lost their homes..and so they
    fought several wars …Obama understands that the 1967
    borders ARE A STARTING POINT…with land swaps and
    a flexible Israeli pm a peace accord can be reached..
    with a pm that is clinging to power based on his
    orthodox support nothing is possible

Leave a Reply

This comment will be displayed anonymously. Your name and email address will not be published.

Comments that are off topic will be removed. If you want a topic to be covered, email me at: ehezi@hush.com

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.