Sometimes You Have to be Profane to be Profound. Not.
By DERICKSON K. LAWRENCE and HANK MILLER

Tribune Archives, Governance, History, Law, Mt. Vernon, New York State, Op-Ed, People, Political Analysis, Westchester County, NY 2 Comments

Hank Miller

Derickson K. Lawrence

MOUNT VERNON, NY — March 6, 2020 — “I don’t need no fake-ass legislators who are allowing fear-mongering to try and go after our people,” said Assemblyman Michael Blake (D-The Bronx). He was allegedly referring to Senate Democrats who are looking to fix the nine–week old (as of this writing) criminal justice reform law. In a deep blue state and legislature, this sort of open fracture among liberal and progressive voices is good for democracy, even when neither side shows signs of backing down.

Fighting for an end to cash bail, criminal justice advocates pulled out all the stops last year. The argument: the old practice created two tiers of the justice system: In one, wealthy people can bond out of jail and work out their cases upon release; in the other, poor people, often accused of low-level crimes, can’t afford bail and have their lives upended while awaiting trial. The bill signed by Governor Andrew M. Cuomo became law on January 1, 2020. But just days after the law took effect, all hell broke loose.

A spate of anti-Semitic attacks over the holidays, in New York City and surrounding areas, spurred critics of the bail law to call for a hate crime exemption to it. 

Independently, others have chimed in. High-ranking judges have called for rollbacks to protect people from possibly dangerous defendants being put back on the streets. Former Westchester County District Attorney, and  New York’s Chief Justice Janet DiFiore, as one example, called the new law “counterproductive”, as reported by the New York Post. “At this moment New York — alone in the nation – does not allow judges the discretion to consider the critically important factor of whether or a not a defendant poses a credible risk of danger to an identified person or groups of persons,” she said at her annual state of judiciary speech.

While passion is high, many of the voices speaking out against the law are not opponents. Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins (D- Yonkers) said her plans would create “the most progressive justice reforms and justice systems in the nation.” But that she would give judges some discretion with extremely strict guidelines and guardrails. And both Governor Cuomo and Mayor Bill DeBlasio, Democrats who are frequently at odds, have expressed support for the concept of tweaking the law to include some form of judicial discretion.

Adding to the pressure is the change in public sentiment.  A February 24, Siena College poll found that 40% of New York voters support the law, down from 55% from last April. However, the change in public sentiment to date has not been enough for a key progressive holdout: Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie (D-Bronx). Why? He is waiting for “relevant data to analyze” before he responds.

Nonetheless, as more members of both houses of the New York Legislature reconsider their positions, the sticking point for the public remains whether the elected officials can find the right balance between individual rights and public safety.

That balance can be best achieved by letting the judges determine on a case-by-case basis who is a flight risk or a danger to the public and helping them make this determination through data-based assessments. New Jersey has implemented such model worth noting. Judicial discretion is also necessary in the discovery component of the law. To turnover “contact info on anyone who has relevant information on a case”, where the  defendant on the case walks, imposes a chilling  effect on those who may want to aid law enforcement in solving crimes, as with Crime Stoppers; or with victims of domestic abuse.

Advocates of the new law should take solace in the notion that there is a common sense middle ground without having to retreat. To get there legislatively requires compromise. In that setting, the loudest voice, or the most profane, does not necessarily produce the best outcome. Protecting communities from violence and preventing the return to over-incarceration are still mutually achievable goals. “Even the best pieces of legislation sometimes have unintended consequences that need to be assessed and acted on,” said New York City’s lead “progressive,” Mayor Bill DeBlasio . We can’t argue with that.

# # #

Political Activists Derickson K. Lawrence and Hank Miller composed this article. Both gentlemen are residents in the City of Mount Vernon. 

###

TribuneSometimes You Have to be Profane to be Profound. Not.
By DERICKSON K. LAWRENCE and HANK MILLER

Comments 2

  1. Just look at the television stations from 03-06-20 and what did you see a large group of teenagers from Crown Heights stomping and kicking a young teenager and taking her sneakers and then on television aboard a NYC bus in the Bronx a male slashing/stabbing another male-in both cases who was committing the crimes and who was the victim-both these instances give you pause for thought which the pandering left politicians like Cousins and Heastie seem to ignore because they are deeply involved in the racial and identity political game.

Leave a Reply

This comment will be displayed anonymously. Your name and email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.